January 27, 2010

New Tactics dialogue on human rights documentation

Documenting Violations: Choosing the Right Approach is an online dialogue being facilitated by New Tactics in Human Rights, beginning today and running through February 5, 2010. From NT:

“This dialogue will feature practitioners that have developed database systems to document human rights violations, organizations on the ground documenting violations, and those that are training practitioners on how to choose the right approach and system for their documentation. We will look at options for ways to collect, store and share your human rights data safely and effectively. If you are trying to figure out the best documenting system for your work – or if you have found something that works well, please join us for this conversation to share your questions, ideas, resources and stories!”

Featured resource practitioners participating in this dialogue include:

  • Vijaya Tripathi and Megan Price work with the Martus database developed by Benetech
  • Agnethe Olesen, Daniel D’Esposito and Bert Verstappen work on the OpenEvSys database developed by HURIDOCS
  • Nathan Freitas of the Guardian Project
  • Jorge Villagran and Sofia Espinosa of the Guatemalan National Police Archive Team
  • Patrick J. Pierce, head of the International Center for Translational Justice – Burma Program
  • Oleg Burlaca, utilizes HURIDOCS methodology and working on websites for World Organisation Against Torture and SOVA Center for Information and Analysis
  • Patrick Stawski, Human Rights Archivist at Duke University and Seth Shaw, Duke’s Libraries’ Electronic Records Archivist
  • Jana Asher, M.S., is the Executive Director of StatAid
  • Agnieszka Raczynska of Red Nacional de Organismos Civiles de Derechos Humanos, Mexico
  • Daniel Rothenberg is the Managing Director of International Projects at the International Human Rights Law Institute (IHRLI) at DePaul University College of Law

The kick-off question is What is documentation? and encompasses such questions as:

  • What do we mean when we talk about human rights documentation?
  • Does ‘documentation’ mean the collection of documentions or the recording of facts about ongoing or recent events? Or both?
  • What are human rights violations?
  • What are some of the assumptions that we have about human rights violations?
  • What are the concerns about quality and standardization of documentation?
  • What is the ‘who did what to whom’ methodology and how can this be applied to documentation?

-Grace

January 4, 2010

‘Archives Power’ virtual reading group

Archives Power

I’ve mentioned the book Archives Power: Memory, Accountability and Social Justice by Rand Jimerson on this blog on a few occasions but haven’t had a chance to post about it at any length.

Luckily, Kate Theimer of ArchivesNext is convening a group read of the book beginning January 11, the site for which is here: http://readingarchivespower.wordpress.com/. Check it out for more details, including Kate’s proposed schedule and discussion format, and for comments from Jimerson, who will also participate. There are already over 50 readers signed up to take part. Should be fun.

- Grace

December 10, 2009

International Outreach Session at AMIA

Last month I blogged about a session we attended at the Association of Moving Image Archivists’ conference in St. Louis. The session, “AV Preservation Exchanges: New York Accra, and Buenos Aires,” discussed two initiatives in which established institutions partnered with international moving image archives lacking in resources. The exchanges involved providing training workshops, knowledge sharing and collaboration, and a student internship opportunity.

Our intern Teague Schneiter happened to record the session with a Flip camera, which we have now posted below. Thanks to intern Michele DeLia for the light editing work, and to panel participants for allowing us to share their presentations.

- Yvonne

December 7, 2009

New & of Note

  • An update on the disposition of the archives of the International Criminal Tribunals for former Yugoslavia and Rwanda is available; see The Documentalist for a good summary, courtesy of James Simon. The fate of the archives has been a matter of particular international controversy. Report S/2009/258 from May 2009 outlines the issues and several options proposed by the UN working group charged with determining issues relating to the “residual mechanisms,” including future and referred prosecutions, witness protection, and other matters in addition to the archives. According to Simon, “This report is tremendously valuable, in that it a) states the case for the importance of the archives, b) provides a detailed description of the types of records generated by the Tribunals, and c) values and users of the Tribunal records. It also sets out recommendations of the activities that should be undertaken before the closure of the tribunals (identification of records to be permanently retained, declassifying as much as possible, transferring electronic records to the main archival database).”
  • The UNESCO Courier newsletter has just published an issue on the topic of “Memory and History,” and includes a variety of articles on archives and memory projects. In particular see a piece by Martín Almada, titled “The Man who Discovered the Archives of Terror,” who describes his search for and discovery of archives relating to Operation Condor. Almada, a former school teacher and principal who was tortured and imprisoned under dictator Alfredo Stroessner now heads the Foundation Celestina Perez de Almada which is devoted to human rights and the environment
  • Finally, I’ve just received a copy of the new book Documentary Testimonies: Global Archives of Suffering, a collection of ten essays edited by Bhaskar Sarkar and Janet Walker, both of UC Santa Barbara Department of Film and Media Studies. Topics include “technologies of capture, storage and circulation; problems of historical veracity/frail memory; generation of video archives–official, renegade, and ephemeral; limits and potentialities of documentary as public record; architectonics of memory; ethics of witnessing and commemoration; human rights and activist publics.” Essays discuss producing testimonies relating to the Rwandan genocide and Hurricane Katrina, the use of Google Earth to monitor the Darfur crisis, TV and radio broadcasting of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission, and more. Looking forward to diving in…

- Grace Lile

December 1, 2009

Voices of Rwanda video testimony project

Our series of video interviews relating to archives and human rights continues on the Hub, with Taylor Krauss, founder/director of Voices of Rwanda.

The project was created to record and preserve the testimonies and life stories of Rwandans, drawing significantly on the genocide but encompassing lives as a whole. To date over 500 hours of testimony have been recorded. Ultimately this video archive will be an educational resource for journalists, historians, academics, psychologists, artists and activists.

From an article last year in the Christian Science Monitor:

“This archive, Krauss hopes, will showcase the future of oral history projects. With a combination of open-source software, Krauss is upping the ante on historical archives. Every word that’s transcribed will be tagged and searchable; with Global Positioning System (GPS) technology, Voices of Rwanda can create individualized maps of survivors’ stories. “In one testimony, a person talks about being born in Kibuye, going down to Cyangugu, crossing the border into Zaire and staying at a camp there, then coming back and staying in Kigali,” Krauss says. “Every stop along the way that he mentions, including the churches he prayed at, are going to be plotted using GPS points. People will be able to look at a map, click on a church, and find five other people who spoke about that church in their testimonies.”

The interview was conducted by Teague Schneiter and edited by Michele DeLia.

-Grace Lile

November 19, 2009

Memory and Justice: ICTJ launches new website

The International Center for Transitional Justice has recently launched a new website, called Memory and Justice. The site includes a database of information about selected memory sites – public memorials, sites of memory/conscience, and similar accountability projects – and is also intended as a space for highlighting and engendering discussion “about the emerging field of memorialization as a form of accountability for past atrocity.”

“In 2001, ICTJ was founded in an effort to assist countries pursuing accountability for past crimes against humanity or human rights abuse. The Center works in societies emerging from repressive rule or armed conflict, as well as in other societies where legacies of abuse remain unresolved. The mission of ICTJ is to redress and prevent severe violations of human rights by confronting legacies of mass abuse. ICTJ seeks holistic solutions to promote just and peaceful societies. Public memorials can contribute to accomplishing these goals. In some cases, they can “redress” severe violations by providing victims a public space to be heard, seen, and recognized, and can in this way provide solace. These initiatives can also contribute to the very complex and multi-causal goal of “prevention”. By being visible reminders on the landscape, by developing pedagogical programming aimed at teaching lessons from the past, and in other ways that are discussed on this site, public memorials can help to create the conditions through which repetition of these crimes becomes less likely. That said, these initiatives can also have the opposite effect. In some post-conflict and post-authoritarian contexts, public memorials can fan the flames of hatred and resentment. When they are created to celebrate ethnic or racial superiority over other groups or to lionize perpetrators of abuse, they can sabotage the building of rights-respecting societies. When memorials are created to assign “blame” to certain groups, they can create angry or defensive reactions. In short, we must engage with public memorials, recognizing where and when they lead to redress and prevention, and commenting on when they are not doing this. This website is meant to be a forum for that debate.”

The database of sites can be searched and browsed in several ways, but what I really like is the approach to tagging; selected vocabulary includes not only “prisons” and “genocide” but also terms such as “controversy” and “vandalized,” presented graphically. It’s a selective list; I am hoping they will continue to add to it. See for example, Cambodia’s Choeung Ek, and Timor-Leste’s Comarca Balide Prison. Or Hamburg’s Monument against Fascism, a “countermonument” which was built to disappear.

Also included: a long and informative article written by Louis Bickford and Debra Schulz on the history of the concept of memory and the past within the human rights movement; and a blog/discussion area designed to grapple with questions such as, for example, Do multiple narratives enhance or hinder a memorial’s meaning?

-Grace

November 17, 2009

Reaching Out at AMIA

On November 4-7, I attended the Association of Moving Image Archivists’ (AMIA) Conference in St. Louis, Missouri.  Since AMIA is based in the US, and most of its conferences are held here, most attendees are American or Canadian.  A handful of participants from larger archiving institutions around the world also usually attend.

There are, however, many more individuals and organizations with at-risk media collections that could benefit from the expertise and skills exchanged at the conference. Recognizing this need to reach out, share knowledge, and collaborate with other moving image archivists and archiving organizations, especially those in parts of the world where resources and formal training opportunities are most lacking, many AMIA members are involved in initiatives with an international focus.

At the conference, I attended a report-back session from two projects that are part of the Audio-Visual Preservation Exchange (APEX), founded by Professor Mona Jimenez at New York University.  The first project that Mona discussed was an ongoing exchange between NYU and various national media institutions in Ghana. This year, it included a weeklong workshop in Accra for staff at Ghanaian broadcasting organizations, and a summer internship for a NYU student.

In her introduction to the session, Mona highlighted archival training as a key identified need, and noted the value of in-person communication and consultation. Ishumael Zinyengere, audiovisual archivist for the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, was one of the trainers on the APEX Ghana team. While he missed his presentation due to a delayed flight, Ishumael’s excellent PowerPoint re-iterated the potential long-term impact of archival training and awareness-building, especially in regions like Africa where there are presently no technical schools for archive studies nor funding from institutions and governments.  While championing international training opportunities sponsored by organizations like AMIA, ICCROM, and IASA, he also stressed the important task of sustaining relationships once they are established through ongoing networking and follow-up.

NYU student Jenn Blaylock then discussed her summer internship in Accra, during which she worked with over 5000 films at the Information Services Department (IDS) of the Ministry of Information.  Having to inspect and clean films with limited access to archival supplies, Jenn learned invaluable skills in how to improvise with materials at hand.

The second APEX initiative, organized by NYU professor Dan Streible and Natalia Fidelholtz, took place in partnership with the Museo del Cine in Buenos Aires and its director (and former WITNESS Archivist!) Paula Felix-Didier. Dan and Natalia solicited donations of supplies from various archival vendors and assembled a media archivist “dream team” to spend a week at the Museo to process film collections, replace shelving, organize storage areas, set up film inspection benches, consult with Museo catalogers and train Museo staff. Natalia and Paula both emphasized how essential the contributions and in-kind donations from the international archival community were to the success of the project.

At the close of the session, APEX member Kara Van Malssen noted that while providing training opportunities is important to enabling local preservation efforts, there is also a great need for playback equipment. In Ghana, for example, there was not a single operational U-Matic deck to be found. Kara urged AMIA members with unused equipment to consider donating their machines.

As an organization, AMIA participates in international efforts via its International Outreach Committee.  You can read more about its charge here. At the meeting of the committee this year, members reported back on various international gatherings, including IASA, CCAAA, SEAPAVAA, and World Day for Audiovisual Heritage. Of note, IASA and AMIA will be holding a joint conference together next year in Philadelphia.  A meeting attendee speaking on behalf of a radio and television archive in Northern Serbia bombed in 1999 raised a point about the pressing need for archival training and supplies in that region, and encouraged AMIA to form a group of archivists to travel there.  Paolo Cherchi-Usai then spoke about the Haghefilm Foundation, which supports individuals and institutions who wish to get training in film preservation at the Haghefilm labs in the Netherlands. Following Paolo, Ujwal Nirgudkar, advisor to the National Film Archive of India, reported on a current film and video survey and preservation project. They hope to restore an Indian film from 1899 next year that will help raise funds and international awareness for their collections. Finally, Kara Van Malssen announced the upcoming SOIMA course in India organized by ICCROM.

Besides the International Outreach Committee, AMIA also participates in international outreach by co-sponsoring the AMIA/Rockefeller Visiting Archivist Fellowship. The Fellowship is awarded each year to a professional archivist from the developing world interested in sharing skills and knowledge.  This year, Naomi Kariu from the Ghana National Film & Television Archive received the fellowship. In a discussion about the challenges that her archive faces, Naomi spoke about the lack of awareness about archives’ needs and standards, most problematically among those in the country charged with making decisions about archives.  She also noted that many people seemed to be working on projects and trying to solve problems on their own, without coming together to collaborate or share knowledge. Her astute observations no doubt resonated with conference participants from other parts of the world!

- Yvonne

November 13, 2009

Copyright: three great new resources

The following new free resources on copyright have just come to my attention:

Copyright Watch: Hosted by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, CW includes a user-friendly database of national copyright laws from around the world, and a blog; the site is intended to be a place to share information about copyright legislation and developments on a global level.

Columbia University Libraries Copyright Resource page: Includes some excellent summaries and tools, including case summaries, model agreements, and much more; I particularly like the Fair Use checklist.

“Copyright and Cultural Institutions: Guidelines for Digitization for U.S. Libraries, Archives, and Museums” : a new book by Peter Hirtle, Emily Hudson and Andrew T. Kenyon from Cornell University Libraries, available as a free download.

November 11, 2009

AMIA 2009: random notes

We are back from the 2009 Association of Moving Image Archivists conference in St Louis, which concluded Saturday. By we I mean myself, my WITNESS co-archivist Yvonne Ng, and our phenomenal interns Michele DeLia, Teague Schneiter and Valentina Catena.

Randomly, here are some things I saw or heard at AMIA that I liked:

WGBH’s Open Vault and “Vietnam: A Television History” archiving Project, with next-generation tools including annotation and citation options, and especially the topic map.

The term “Image-driven scholarship.”

Chris Lacinak’s presentation on “Accessioning and Managing File-based Born-Digital Content.”

PrestoPrime’s wiki for digital preservation.

CEDAR, a “collection of Collaborative Empirical Databases to be used as an Archivists’ Resource for work relating to Moving Image and Sound Preservation and Archiving.” – a Beta project from AudioVisual Preservation Solutions.

Mediapedia: A media identification tool, a work in progress at National Library of Australia.

Indiana Museum of Art’s online real-time (sorta) Dashboard shown by Suzanne M. Fischer as an example of “radical transparency in action.”

The St Louis Dispatch’s front-page story about the conference.

Johan Oomen’s slides from “Inside Out and Outside In: examples of user engagement in AV archives” about Open Images.

Tums_IMG_3023

Built 1888, last downtown factory in St Lou. Tums were invented in 1928.

DV Analyzer, a new tool from Audiovisual Preservation Solutions which does error-reporting on DV-to-digital transfers; it’s free!

MPEG Streamclip free video converter tool (as per Skip Elsheimer).

Dave Rice’s demo showing error concealment suppressed and replaced by white space – whoa!

 

“Streaming is for sissies.” Rick Prelinger, in “The Problem of Open Media” session.

Peter Kaufman’s statistic on rights clearance for BBC Creative Archive: 6300 staff hours to clear 524 hours of media…

November 2, 2009

Khmer Legacies: Interview with Socheata Poeuv

The Hub is currently featuring a video interview with Socheata Poeuv, a visiting fellow at the Yale University Genocide Studies Program.  Poeuv is the founder and director of Khmer Legacies, a nonprofit organization dedicated to preserving the history of the Cambodian genocide by recording video testimonials of its survivors. In this interview (conducted by Teague Schneiter), Poeuv reflects on how archives – and specifically Khmer Legacies’ video archives – help protect human rights by redefining the way we record, preserve, and ultimately understand genocide and mass atrocities. She discusses some of the particularities of video testimonies, as well as the ethical concerns inherent to the online distribution of video content. This video is part of our ongoing spotlight on The Role of Archives in Human Rights.