May 13, 2010

We’ve moved!

Some of the WITNESS Media Archive + friends: Chris Lacinak, Grace Lile, Ryan Kautz, Yvonne Ng, Bryan Nunez

WITNESS Media Archive is pleased to now be part of The WITNESS Blog.  There, under Archiving Human Rights you will find posts from WITNESS archivists Grace and Yvonne, and guest bloggers, on archive-related topics, along with our entire archive of blog posts since 2007.

Our first post is a recap of our recent strategic planning outcomes, and gives an overview of some shifts in direction and future plans.

Our website remains the same, but look for changes there in the next year as well.

Thanks!

Grace Lile, May 2010

April 15, 2010

Highlights from the Orphan Film Symposium: Part 2

Following on my post Tuesday, here are more highlights from the Orphan Film Symposium I attended last week:

Former WITNESS Media Archive intern Jennifer Blaylock gave a spirited talk on international digitization projects and potential pitfalls.  Speaking specifically about projects in which richer countries assist poorer ones with digitization and repository services, she warns against reproducing colonial scenarios in which valuable cultural objects are extracted from poorer nations out of a misguided paternalism. She raises an important issue here; however, I think it would have been useful for the audience to learn about specific examples of when this has happened, and perhaps also examples of successful collaborations.

Jennifer also discussed how important contextual information is lost when a digitized object is accessed online, rather than as a physical object in its original organization and setting. I agree to some extent, although I would argue that part of our job as archivists (working in both physical and digital environments) is to ensure that we retain and document as much original order and context as possible.

Overall, Jennifer emphasized the need to develop approaches appropriate for local contexts and available resources.  I look forward to following her work in the coming year as she heads back to Ghana!

Ishumael Zinyengere presented on the National Archives of Zimbabwe, which is governed under the National Archives of Zimbabwe Act of 1986 by the Ministry of Home Affairs. He gave a brief history of the collection, which includes colonial films by the Central African Filming Unit (CAFU), and later the Rhodesia Information Service and then the Zimbabwe Information Service.  Ishumael has previously elaborated on the history and current circumstances of the NAZ in the December 2008 issue of International Preservation News.

Ishumael sees collaboration and partnerships as key to providing the necessary training and resources for audiovisual preservation.  He cited current examples such as the training exchanges between Zimbabwe and the Netherlands, and between Tanzania and France.  He also highlighted the annual conferences and meetings of the three African regional branches of the International Council on Archives (ICA) –  CENARBICA, ESARBICA, and WARBICA – as collaborative sites. ESARBICA, the Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Branch of the ICA, has struck its own Technical Committee, for instance.

In the future, Zinyengere envisions a central resource within Africa that could provide training and handle larger-scale projects. In his presentation, he pointed to the groundbreaking work that is being done in South Africa, where there is ample government and external support for archives, as an example to follow.

The final presentation that I’ll mention here is Martha Wallner’s talk on Nicaraguan Television and the Latin American Video Archives (LAVA) project. Wallner was part of Xchange TV, a group of independent media producers based in New York that participated in a solidarity project to exchange television programs between North and Central America during the US blockade on trade with Nicaragua in the 1980s.

During the US blockade, Nicaraguan production units frequently recycled videotapes.  As a result, the tapes that XChange TV brought into the US have become, in some cases, the only surviving copies of television programming made during that dynamic period in Nicaraguan history.

Wallner showed excerpts from a few Nicaraguan productions, which have been preserved by The MediaPreserve:

Sociodrama
(La Ciera Colective and Ministry of Agrarian Reform [MIDINRA] Communications Unit, ca. 1984; 3/4-inch U-matic videotape, color, sound)

These sociodrama campesinos in the small town of El Regadio create a series of vignettes illustrating the revolution’s positive impact on their town as well as one town member’s skepticism.

Cabildo de Mujeres
(Sistema Sandinista de Televisión, ca. 1986; 3/4-inch U-matic videotape, color, sound)

In Cabildo de Mujeres (Women’s Town Hall Meeting), women gather to discuss and debate proposed changes to the Nicaraguan constitution including policies on abortion, divorce, prostitution, child support, and domestic violence.

Aqui en Esta Esquina
(Sistema Sandinista de Television, 1984; 3/4-inch U-matic videotape, color, sound)

Produced during the 1980s after the Nicaraguan Revolution in 1979. The show was produced on location with live audiences in towns throughout Nicaragua. A game show with a revolutionary twist, the program had children and elders perform local folk arts and audience members compete for modest prizes. The Sandinista-inspired quiz competitions involved questions about their town’s historical contributions to the revolution.

Wallner is currently seeking a digital repository for the collection.

April 13, 2010

Highlights from the Orphan Film Symposium: Part 1

Last week I attended the 7th Orphan Film Symposium in New York City.  “Orphans,” as it is known, is a biannual event that draws archivists, preservationists, scholars, collectors, and artists from around the world to watch and discuss non-commercial and/or neglected films.  This year’s theme was “Moving Pictures Around the World,” and included presentations and works from 17 countries.

One of the most interesting panels was on the topic of “Repatriation,” and featured a talk by Paolo Cherchi Usai, Director of the Haghefilm Foundation, and former Director of the National Film and Sound Archive of Australia.

According to Cherchi Usai, repatriation may be understood as an act of justice, of returning objects that were illegitimately taken from their place of origin.  Repatriation is not about “exchange,” which implies a balance of trade, but the moral rights of owners. These rights apply not only to nation states, but also to ethnic, language, or other groups within a nation state.

From the point of view of the repatriating archive, repatriation is an act of deaccession; for the receiving archive, it is seen as “collection development.”  Cherchi Usai points up examples of international film repatriation projects from the 1960s and 1980s that served the dual aims of allowing repatriating countries to delegate preservation work deemed to have secondary value to the country to other parties, and enabling receiving countries to fill gaps in their national collection.

Cherchi Usai problematizes this convenient arrangement, however, arguing that repatriation must be done for the right reasons; irresponsible deaccessioning, on one hand, and poor collection policy, on the other, are not good ones!  Moreover, he argues that while a film in a repatriating country’s collection may not belong to that country, it must have circulated or been distributed there at some point, thus making it part of its national film heritage.  The film archives in the Netherlands reflects this perspective, and collects both Dutch and international productions.

Cherchi Usai suggests that films and reproducible media are different from other cultural objects, precisely because they can be copied.  The repatriation of films and other media therefore does not necessarily need to involve the transfer of the original physical object.  New prints and copies can be made, ensuring that both the receiving country and the source country have access to shared pieces of film heritage.  Cherchi Usai also emphasizes that repatriation is not just about the return of a physical carrier, but also the rights of the people and things depicted in the images.

On a practical level, Cherchi Usai stresses the importance of transparency in the curatorial principles and objectives behind any repatriation project, as well as written contracts with stated timeline and deadlines.  He also warns institutions against committing to any repatriation agreements unless they have the resources to fulfill their obligations.  Ultimately, he argues, the goal of repatriation should be to benefit the public by increasing their access to preserved film heritage.

More on the rest of Orphans tomorrow…

- Yvonne

April 12, 2010

Archives Without Borders

The preliminary program is now available for the Archives Without Borders international congress announced some months ago.  Co-hosted by VVBAD, the Flemish association for archivists and librarians, and KVAN, the Dutch association for archivists, the meeting will be held August 30 and 31, 2010 in the Peace Palace in The Hague, The Netherlands.  According to the conference website:

“Good archives and records management practices are a condition for ensuring continuity, efficiency and transparency of public and private services and stakeholder accountability. The Congress will focus on the importance of archives for good governance in an international context where their significance transcends national boundaries in the globalized information society. As the memory of society, archives are not only important from a cultural point of view, but also from the perspective of supporting efficient management practices. In the records continuum approach to record keeping, where records are managed from the point of creation, accountability is supported through ongoing attention to good records and archives management practices which underpin democracy and human rights. Such a continuous management approach is important in the transitory digital era.”

Keynote speakers include Antonio González Quintana and Eric Ketelaar.  Parallel sessions are organized around 4 broad areas, including human rights and archives;  archival solidarity;  cross-border archives; and formation of the nation-state and national identity.  The human rights portion lists the following speakers/topics:

  • Youssef El Bouhairi / Morocco: ‘Archive and Justice’
  • Patricia Huenuqueo Canales / Chile: ‘Archivos Públicos y Represión en Chile: Las Incapacidades de la Memoria’
  • Tine Berg Floater / Norway: ‘Documenting forced labour in Norway during World War II’
  • Livia Iacovino / Australia: ‘Silent witnesses: Implementation of international human rights as warrants for archival agenda for Indigenous Australians’
  • Muhammad Lutful Haq / Bangladesh: ‘Right to Information Act and Record Management System in Bangladesh’
  • Gabriella Citroni / Italy:  ‘El derecho a la verdad y el acceso a los archivos: logros y retos’
  • Michelle Caswell / USA: ‘Khmer Rouge Archives: Accountability, Truth, and Memory in Cambodia’

February 12, 2010

SAA Human Rights Roundtable approved

Word comes from Valerie Love, U Conn’s Curator of Human Rights Collections, that the petition to create a Human Rights Roundtable of the Society of American Archivists has been approved; Valerie made the case here last October. A huge thanks to Valerie and T-Kay Sangwand of U Texas for making this happen; they are eager to hear ideas and begin planning a first meeting for SAA 2010 in Washington DC.

February 10, 2010

New Tactics Dialogue follow-up

Earlier this month New Tactics in Human Rights hosted an online dialogue Documenting Human Rights Violations: Choosing the Right Approach featuring practitioners from a variety of fields.  Although a bit hard to navigate, there’s a wealth of interesting commentary.  Here are a few highlights:

Human rights thesauri; from Daniel Esposito: HURIDOCS  is working on an online thesauri browser; standardized vocabularies for HR documentation challenges are important and beneficial but difficult to implement.

XML for data sharing; from Kenan Zahirovic: “…XML is a basis for many standards. After all, if musicians and chemists have XML standards , why not some sort of standard  for HR violations? Well, technically speaking, we need a XML Schema but in an essence it’s a question of consensus – if we can agree what data we want to exchange (data on victims, incidents, witnesses…) and what attributes (name, address, age…) then we can make our own “standard”. Does it make a sense or it’s too complicated? Or maybe we already have some sort of standard for this?”

Preserving HR documentation for the long-term; from Patrick Stawski:  “A crime occurs today; our technology documents it and generates evidence that can be immediately analyzed and disseminated. But typically (as is the case today with Cambodia, the former Yugoslavia, Guatemala, and many other places where communties are seeking justice for past crimes) only a long way down the line, years possibly decades later, is there is a chance for justice. Will the evidence we generate through our new documentation strategies be around to support prosecution and attempts at accountability?” Patrick illustrates some of the challenges with Duke’s current efforts to archive the IMI audiovisual collection.

Challenges of visual documentation within the HR framework; from Sam Gregory:  “If we assume that in five, ten years time, perhaps 90% of visual documentation of human rights violations will have been gathered outside of the formal human rights infrastructure, how do we make sure that this citizen documentation is of value to more formal documentation/advocacy processes (which will continue to be important for securing protection and redress) both in real-time and after the fact?”

The Iraq History Project; from Daniel Rothenberg:  A description of the scope and methodology of a large-scale documentation project based at DePaul University College of Law;  “The project has three main objectives: documenting past and present violations by collecting large numbers of testimonies from around the country; analyzing this material to reveal patterns of violence and repression; and, encouraging the development of domestic and international policies to assist victims through reparations, memorialization, education and national reconciliation. The project seeks to contribute to an improved understanding of the scope, impact and severity of systematic political violence over the past four decades in Iraq and to aid a broad social process of transitional justice, national reconciliation and reconstruction.”

Documentation realities at the grassroots; from Khan Agha Daewoodzai:  “So what would be the approaches and strategies if we want to localize these tools and resources to those who are working at the community level with limited access to information technology or other tools.“   This is a key thread throughout the dialogue; the gulf between the emerging technologies and capacity and infrastructure for implementation at the grassroots level.

Finally, What is documentation? from Daniel Esposito:  a succinct summary of some of the myriad forms documentation can take, including testimony, statistical analysis, legal and evidentiary, archival, and so on.

There’s much more – about the use of mobiles in documentation, about the Martus and OpenEvys systems, victim testimonies, data security, working with networks, and more.  A great resource.  But it seems a lot of questions were posed which could benefit from further consideration or discussion.  It’s a rather broad topic with many dimensions.   I’d love to see a follow-up.

January 27, 2010

New Tactics dialogue on human rights documentation

Documenting Violations: Choosing the Right Approach is an online dialogue being facilitated by New Tactics in Human Rights, beginning today and running through February 5, 2010. From NT:

“This dialogue will feature practitioners that have developed database systems to document human rights violations, organizations on the ground documenting violations, and those that are training practitioners on how to choose the right approach and system for their documentation. We will look at options for ways to collect, store and share your human rights data safely and effectively. If you are trying to figure out the best documenting system for your work – or if you have found something that works well, please join us for this conversation to share your questions, ideas, resources and stories!”

Featured resource practitioners participating in this dialogue include:

  • Vijaya Tripathi and Megan Price work with the Martus database developed by Benetech
  • Agnethe Olesen, Daniel D’Esposito and Bert Verstappen work on the OpenEvSys database developed by HURIDOCS
  • Nathan Freitas of the Guardian Project
  • Jorge Villagran and Sofia Espinosa of the Guatemalan National Police Archive Team
  • Patrick J. Pierce, head of the International Center for Translational Justice – Burma Program
  • Oleg Burlaca, utilizes HURIDOCS methodology and working on websites for World Organisation Against Torture and SOVA Center for Information and Analysis
  • Patrick Stawski, Human Rights Archivist at Duke University and Seth Shaw, Duke’s Libraries’ Electronic Records Archivist
  • Jana Asher, M.S., is the Executive Director of StatAid
  • Agnieszka Raczynska of Red Nacional de Organismos Civiles de Derechos Humanos, Mexico
  • Daniel Rothenberg is the Managing Director of International Projects at the International Human Rights Law Institute (IHRLI) at DePaul University College of Law

The kick-off question is What is documentation? and encompasses such questions as:

  • What do we mean when we talk about human rights documentation?
  • Does ‘documentation’ mean the collection of documentions or the recording of facts about ongoing or recent events? Or both?
  • What are human rights violations?
  • What are some of the assumptions that we have about human rights violations?
  • What are the concerns about quality and standardization of documentation?
  • What is the ‘who did what to whom’ methodology and how can this be applied to documentation?

-Grace

January 4, 2010

‘Archives Power’ virtual reading group

Archives Power

I’ve mentioned the book Archives Power: Memory, Accountability and Social Justice by Rand Jimerson on this blog on a few occasions but haven’t had a chance to post about it at any length.

Luckily, Kate Theimer of ArchivesNext is convening a group read of the book beginning January 11, the site for which is here: http://readingarchivespower.wordpress.com/. Check it out for more details, including Kate’s proposed schedule and discussion format, and for comments from Jimerson, who will also participate. There are already over 50 readers signed up to take part. Should be fun.

- Grace

December 10, 2009

International Outreach Session at AMIA

Last month I blogged about a session we attended at the Association of Moving Image Archivists’ conference in St. Louis. The session, “AV Preservation Exchanges: New York Accra, and Buenos Aires,” discussed two initiatives in which established institutions partnered with international moving image archives lacking in resources. The exchanges involved providing training workshops, knowledge sharing and collaboration, and a student internship opportunity.

Our intern Teague Schneiter happened to record the session with a Flip camera, which we have now posted below. Thanks to intern Michele DeLia for the light editing work, and to panel participants for allowing us to share their presentations.

- Yvonne

December 7, 2009

New & of Note

  • An update on the disposition of the archives of the International Criminal Tribunals for former Yugoslavia and Rwanda is available; see The Documentalist for a good summary, courtesy of James Simon. The fate of the archives has been a matter of particular international controversy. Report S/2009/258 from May 2009 outlines the issues and several options proposed by the UN working group charged with determining issues relating to the “residual mechanisms,” including future and referred prosecutions, witness protection, and other matters in addition to the archives. According to Simon, “This report is tremendously valuable, in that it a) states the case for the importance of the archives, b) provides a detailed description of the types of records generated by the Tribunals, and c) values and users of the Tribunal records. It also sets out recommendations of the activities that should be undertaken before the closure of the tribunals (identification of records to be permanently retained, declassifying as much as possible, transferring electronic records to the main archival database).”
  • The UNESCO Courier newsletter has just published an issue on the topic of “Memory and History,” and includes a variety of articles on archives and memory projects. In particular see a piece by Martín Almada, titled “The Man who Discovered the Archives of Terror,” who describes his search for and discovery of archives relating to Operation Condor. Almada, a former school teacher and principal who was tortured and imprisoned under dictator Alfredo Stroessner now heads the Foundation Celestina Perez de Almada which is devoted to human rights and the environment
  • Finally, I’ve just received a copy of the new book Documentary Testimonies: Global Archives of Suffering, a collection of ten essays edited by Bhaskar Sarkar and Janet Walker, both of UC Santa Barbara Department of Film and Media Studies. Topics include “technologies of capture, storage and circulation; problems of historical veracity/frail memory; generation of video archives–official, renegade, and ephemeral; limits and potentialities of documentary as public record; architectonics of memory; ethics of witnessing and commemoration; human rights and activist publics.” Essays discuss producing testimonies relating to the Rwandan genocide and Hurricane Katrina, the use of Google Earth to monitor the Darfur crisis, TV and radio broadcasting of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission, and more. Looking forward to diving in…

- Grace Lile